ChineseStudy

Full Text

Contents

Text

English translation

“Rules for Disciples” presents itself as guidance for learners and younger members of a household; “the teaching of the sages” grounds it in the Confucian tradition, conventionally associated with Confucius. “First, filial conduct and fraternal respect” places honoring parents and treating elder siblings respectfully at the start. In its Qing-era family setting, this reflects a hierarchical ethic, not a modern requirement of unconditional obedience or acceptance of abuse. “Next, care and trustworthiness” calls for measured conduct, keeping promises, and speaking honestly before pursuing literary learning.

“Care broadly for all people” asks one not to reserve decency only for friends and relatives; here “care” means humane regard within ethical boundaries, not the removal of every boundary. “Then draw close to the humane” advises keeping company with people who act with benevolence and learning from them. “When there is energy left” means after the stated duties have been met and time and capacity remain. “Then study writing and learning” places texts, literacy, and cultural study after practical conduct. This is the text’s priority order, not a reason today to undervalue education or to impose unlimited family duties on one person.

When parents call, one should answer without delay. When parents give an order or instruction, one should carry it out promptly and without laziness. This reflects a Qing-era expectation of prompt filial obedience; as a historical rule, it does not justify obeying unlawful, harmful, or unsafe commands today.

When parents teach or admonish, the text requires respectful listening. When they rebuke a child, it requires accepting the reprimand rather than arguing back. This reflects Qing family hierarchy and may include the period’s expectation that punishment be endured. Today, one may listen to specific and fair criticism while explaining facts or objecting; the passage does not justify abuse or require a child to surrender safety and rights.

In winter, the child should keep the parents warm; in summer, keep them cool. In the morning, the child should inquire about their well-being, and in the evening make sure they are settled for the night. These are traditional rules of household care and twice-daily greeting. Today they can be understood as practical attention to an older person’s comfort, health, and rest rather than a mandatory ritual schedule.

Before going out, the child should tell the parents; on returning, the child should appear before them and report back. Daily living should follow a stable pattern, and study or work should not be changed capriciously. The passage reflects parental oversight of a child’s movements and life path. Today, safety check-ins and communication about major plans are reasonable, but adults need not surrender unlimited control over where they live or what work they choose.

Even when a matter is small, one should not act arbitrarily or solely on one’s own authority. To do so would, under the text’s traditional ethic, fall short of a child’s proper duty. This reflects Qing-era restrictions on junior family members’ autonomy, but it should not be turned into a modern rule that children must obtain parental permission for every action or obey unconditionally.

Even a small object should not, according to the text, be hidden or kept secretly from one’s parents. If it is, the parents may be hurt by distrust, worry, or a sense of distance. The rule emphasizes transparency about property within a traditional household. Today, shared belongings and agreed household rules should be respected, while children and adults alike retain legitimate personal possessions, privacy, and property rights.

“What parents like, do one’s best to provide; what parents dislike, carefully avoid or remove.” The passage treats accommodating parental preferences as a filial duty. Today, one may respect parents’ reasonable needs and preferences, but should not assist illegal, harmful, or discriminatory demands or use those preferences to infringe other people’s legitimate rights.

“Injury to the body brings worry to one’s parents” treats personal safety as a family concern. “Damage to one’s character brings shame to one’s parents” says that misconduct may affect the family’s standing. These are prescriptions of traditional family ethics, not a demand today to hide illness, avoid necessary care, or make parents responsible for every mistake.

“When one’s parents love one, being filial is not difficult; when one’s parents hate or reject one, remaining filial is considered truly worthy.” The traditional text praises maintaining filial duties despite parental hostility. Today, however, this should not be used to require anyone to endure abuse, coercion, or danger; care may include firm boundaries and outside support.

“When a parent is at fault, remonstrate so that the parent may change; keep one’s expression pleasant and one’s voice gentle.” The traditional text calls for tactful correction of parental wrongdoing. Today, however, respect does not require silence about abuse, illegality, or danger, nor does it mean unconditional obedience.

“If the remonstrance is not accepted, try again when the parent is in a better mood; follow with tearful pleading, and bear even a beating without resentment.” The last two clauses reflect an older ideal of parental authority and tolerance of corporal punishment. They must not be used to justify domestic violence or hitting children today; anyone facing violence should prioritize safety and seek appropriate protective or legal help.

“When a parent is ill, taste the medicine first; attend day and night without leaving the bedside.” This describes an old ideal of personally checking medicinal preparations and maintaining a constant vigil. Today, medication should be handled according to medical advice, labeling, and safety procedures, not sampled by the caregiver. Caregivers also need adequate sleep and rest and may share shifts or obtain professional nursing rather than remain continuously at the bedside.

“Mourn for three years and often be choked with grief; alter one’s usual way of living and abstain from alcohol and meat.” This describes the extended mourning and self-denial required by the traditional Confucian mourning system. Modern people need not follow the same duration, dietary restrictions, or living arrangements, and may grieve in ways suited to their personal, family, and cultural circumstances.

“In mourning, fulfill the rites; in rites of remembrance, show complete sincerity. Serve the dead as one served them while alive.” The line calls for full observance of traditional mourning rites and sincere ritual service to the deceased. These requirements belong to an older funerary system; today no single ceremony is mandatory, nor need the line be taken to mean that the dead literally require the same material care as the living. Families may choose practices consistent with their beliefs, the law, and their circumstances.

“An elder brother’s way is friendliness” means that he should treat his younger brother with affection; “a younger brother’s way is respect” requires the younger brother to show deference. Harmony between brothers is presented as part of filial conduct. These are the primer’s historical age- and gender-based roles; today, mutual respect and care may be extended to all siblings without demanding unconditional obedience from the younger.

If siblings do not place excessive importance on possessions and material gain or loss, resentment is less likely to arise. If they exercise restraint in speech, anger will naturally subside. The passage emphasizes minimizing disputes over property and controlling one’s words; it does not mean that a victim should tolerate abuse, threats, or injustice.

“Whether eating or drinking” and “whether sitting or walking” extend the rule to ordinary shared activities. “The older go first, the younger afterward” prescribes precedence for elders in seating, movement, or service. This reflects Qing-era age hierarchy. Today it may survive as courtesy when safety and fairness are unaffected, but age alone should not confer permanent priority or control over others.

When an elder calls for someone, the younger person who hears should immediately summon that person on the elder’s behalf. If the person is absent, the younger person should promptly go to the elder, report the absence, and ask what is needed. This reflects a traditional household hierarchy in which juniors attended to elders. Today it may be understood as prompt communication, not as requiring children to perform unreasonable errands or surrender legitimate boundaries.

When addressing a respected elder or superior, the text requires an appropriate title rather than direct use of the person’s given name. In such a person’s presence, one should not deliberately display or flaunt one’s abilities. This reflects traditional status etiquette; today, courtesy and modesty need not prevent anyone from stating their competence, opinions, or disagreements as an equal.

When meeting an elder or respected senior on the road, the text directs one to approach promptly and offer the traditional clasped-hands salute. If the elder says nothing, one should step back and stand respectfully. This is a rule of traditional seniority etiquette; today, a safe and courteous greeting with appropriate personal space may replace the prescribed ritual and waiting.

If one encounters a respected elder while riding, one should dismount; if traveling in a carriage, one should get out. Even after the elder has passed, one is to remain waiting until the elder is more than a hundred paces away. This was an especially deferential rule of traditional road etiquette. Today, traffic safety and context should take priority, with slowing, yielding, or a courteous greeting replacing literal observance.

When an elder is standing, the younger person should not sit; even after the elder sits, the younger should wait for permission or instruction before sitting. This reflects the age hierarchy of traditional etiquette. Today it may be understood as consideration for others’ seating needs and courteous yielding, not as a basis for demanding absolute obedience or denying equal rights.

“In the presence of respected elders” identifies the setting, and “the voice should be low” calls for a quiet, courteous manner. “If it is so low that it cannot be heard” describes the opposite excess, and “that is not appropriate” rejects it. The passage asks for restraint without sacrificing audibility. Today this means adjusting one’s volume to the situation and speaking clearly, not making younger people universally whisper or remain silent before older people.

When approaching an elder or superior, advance promptly; when withdrawing, leave slowly. When questioned, rise and answer without letting the gaze wander. These are hierarchical forms of traditional etiquette; today, the underlying point may be attentive engagement, not compulsory standing or sustained direct eye contact.

Treat one’s paternal uncles as one treats one’s father, and treat one’s elder brothers and other senior male relatives as one treats one’s own elder brother. The passage reflects the hierarchy of the traditional extended family. Today it may be read as encouraging regard for relatives, not unconditional obedience; abuse, coercion, or boundary violations warrant protection and support.

Rise early in the morning and go to sleep late at night. Because old age comes quickly, cherish the present time. This is a historical discipline of diligence, not a sound modern reason to promote chronic sleep deprivation.

“In the morning, wash” requires basic cleansing after waking. “Also rinse the mouth” adds oral care. “After returning from the toilet,” one should “always clean the hands”; in present-day terms, this means following ordinary handwashing and hygiene practice.

Keep the headwear straight and fasten the ties or closures of the clothing. Socks and shoes should both be worn securely and neatly, not left loose or trailing. The line concerns orderly dress, not a requirement to retain historical garments.

“When putting away headwear and clothes,” give each item “a designated place.” “Do not leave them in disorder,” since careless piles may “cause them to become dirty.” The practical point is orderly storage and cleanliness, not a prescribed type of furniture or ritual.

Clothing is valued for cleanliness, not splendor. Under the traditional norm, it should conform to one’s allotted status and suit the means of one’s household. This reflects historical distinctions of rank and wealth; today it may support cleanliness and moderation, but not ranking people by dress or class.

“When it comes to food, do not pick and choose. Eat an appropriate amount, and do not exceed the proper limit.” This is a historical injunction against selectiveness and excess. Present-day dietary choices may properly account for health conditions, allergies, religious requirements, and medical advice, and the line should not be used to force anyone to eat unsuitable food.

“While still young, do not drink alcohol. Becoming drunk from drinking is most unseemly.” The line uses the moral language of its period to condemn drunken conduct. In a modern context, minors should follow applicable drinking-age laws and receive health education rather than personal humiliation.

“Walk with composure, and stand upright. When making the clasped-hands salute, bow deeply and fully; when performing a formal salutation, do so reverently.” These are historical rules of ritual bearing. The precise form of bai varied by period and setting and should not automatically be understood as kowtowing.

“Do not tread on the threshold” tells one not to step on the doorway sill, and “do not lean unevenly” rejects a slouching, one-legged stance. “Do not sit with the legs spread or stretched out like a winnowing basket” criticizes an expansive seated posture, while “do not shake the thighs” forbids restless leg movement. These were older rules about posture and doorway etiquette. Today the practical points are safety, cleanliness, and not obstructing others; bodily differences or involuntary movements should not be treated as moral faults.

“Lift the curtain slowly” calls for controlled movement, and “make no sound” asks that the curtain be handled quietly. “Take corners widely” means allowing enough room when turning, and “do not strike the edges” means avoiding walls, furniture, and other sharp corners. The passage emphasizes quiet consideration, careful movement, and preventing damage or disturbance.

“Hold an empty vessel as though it were full”: handle even an empty object steadily and carefully. “Enter an empty room as though someone were present”: remain restrained and proper even when no one is watching. The line teaches care and disciplined conduct in private.

“Do not rush a task” advises against frantic action, because “haste brings many mistakes.” “Do not fear difficulty” says not to retreat merely because a task is demanding, while “do not treat it lightly” warns against careless handling or skipped details. The passage rejects both rashness and avoidance; today, the proper pace should still reflect the task’s risks, deadline, and the person’s capacity.

“Never go near places of fighting and uproar. Never inquire into matters regarded as perverse or improper.” The second phrase reflects a broad historical moral category and a prohibition on seeking such information. It should not today be used to suppress necessary questions or requests for help concerning safety, health, abuse, or crime.

“When you are about to enter a doorway” refers to approaching another person’s room or residence, and “ask who is there” requires checking who may be inside. “When you are about to enter the main room” refers to a more inward or formal interior space, and “your voice must be raised” means announcing your arrival beforehand. The purpose was to avoid barging in and startling people. Today this is best practiced by knocking, waiting for a response, and stating one’s presence before entering private or shared spaces, not by shouting everywhere.

“人问谁” describes being asked who you are, and “对以名” instructs you to answer with your name. “吾与我” refers to replying only with a pronoun such as “I,” while “不分明” says that this leaves your identity unclear. The passage reflects a traditional rule of courteous introduction; today, identify yourself clearly when appropriate, but do not treat it as a duty to disclose personal information indiscriminately to strangers.

To use another person’s belongings, one must ask openly and obtain permission. Taking or using them without asking is treated by the text as theft. The line stresses respect for others’ property and permission to use it.

When borrowing another person’s belongings, return them promptly, within the agreed or reasonable time. Then, if an urgent need arises later, others may be more willing to lend to you. The line stresses reliability, not a future entitlement to someone else’s property.

Whenever one speaks, trustworthiness should come first. How could deceitful or false words be acceptable? The line stresses honesty and keeping one’s word; it does not require indiscriminate disclosure regardless of privacy, safety, or verification.

Speaking less is preferable to speaking at length. Say what is true and sound, rather than using flattery, sophistry, or verbal cleverness to win approval. The point is concise, honest speech, not silence even when a reasonable answer is needed.

Avoid sly or manipulative speech, as well as obscene and filthy words. The text also tells readers to reject what it calls the “marketplace manner,” reflecting a Qing-era prejudice that associated ordinary urban and commercial life with vulgarity. Today this should not be used to demean residents, workers, or people of lower social status; the applicable point is to avoid manipulation, abuse, and obscenity.

Do not speak hastily about something you have not seen clearly. Do not pass on information when what you know is still uncertain. The line calls for checking facts before commenting or repeating a report, rather than presenting conjecture as reliable news.

If a matter is unsuitable, beyond your ability, or not yet clear, do not promise lightly. Once a careless promise has been made, either carrying it out or backing away may create mistakes and difficulty. The instruction is to assess feasibility before committing, not to agree immediately to every request.

When pronouncing words, speak steadily, at a measured pace, and clearly. Do not rush or speak indistinctly. The point is to make oneself understandable, not to slow every conversation artificially.

When people discuss others’ merits and faults or trade gossip, do not casually meddle in matters that do not concern you. The line warns against needless involvement in gossip and disputes; it does not preclude necessary action when safety, duty, or legitimate rights are involved.

When you see someone act well, consider how to approach that standard. Even if you are far behind, improve step by step. The passage recommends learning from another person’s strengths, not pretending that everyone must be identical.

When you see wrongdoing in another person, examine yourself for the same fault. If you have it, correct it; if you do not, stay alert so that you do not acquire it. This calls for self-examination, not for taking blame for someone else’s conduct.

If you fall short of others in character, learning, ability, or practical skills, work to strengthen yourself. The text treats these qualities as areas for improvement; today, a person’s worth need not be reduced to competitive ranking, nor must anyone excel in every area.

Do not be distressed because your clothes or food are less fine than someone else’s. The passage rejects status anxiety based on possessions; it does not mean that people today should disregard basic needs, poverty, or legitimate efforts to improve living conditions.

If you become angry at criticism and delighted by praise, harmful companions may gather around you while constructive friends withdraw. The warning concerns a preference for flattery over honest feedback; accepting criticism today still requires distinguishing useful advice from abuse or insult.

Be cautious and self-reflective when praised, and be glad to hear of your faults. Then upright and trustworthy people will gradually draw close. Readiness to accept helpful correction does not require tolerating humiliation or abuse.

Wrongdoing committed without intent is called a mistake; wrongdoing committed deliberately is called evil. The couplet distinguishes lack of intent from deliberate action, though lack of intent does not by itself remove responsibility for actual harm.

If a fault is corrected, it may be brought to an end; if it is concealed, another offense is added. Correcting a fault does not necessarily erase consequences already caused, which may still require responsibility and repair.

“Every person should be treated with care” calls for regard toward all human beings. “The same sky covers us and the same earth supports us” presents shared existence as the reason not to exclude people arbitrarily because of status, origin, or personal closeness. This is the text’s ideal of universal benevolence; today it should mean respecting everyone’s dignity and equal rights, not excusing harm or unlawful conduct.

A person of noble conduct naturally gains a high reputation. What people truly value is such conduct, not an impressive outward appearance. The passage contrasts character with appearance; it does not justify contempt for anyone’s body or looks.

A person with substantial ability earns substantial regard through real accomplishment. What wins people’s respect is not grandiose talk, but demonstrated competence and action. The passage does not require anyone to conceal their abilities; it rejects the use of boasting alone as a substitute for achievement.

If you have a skill, do not hoard it solely for yourself; share or use it to help others when appropriate without surrendering your own legitimate boundaries. Do not belittle or mock what another person can do. In present terms, this supports cooperation and respect, but it does not demand unlimited unpaid labor or forbid specific, constructive criticism.

Do not flatter the wealthy or act arrogantly toward the poor. Do not reject old friends or favor new acquaintances merely for their novelty. The passage warns against treating people according to wealth and against fickleness in friendship; it does not prohibit making new friends or ending harmful relationships.

When another person is occupied and not at leisure, do not disturb them with matters. When another person is unsettled, do not disturb them further with talk. The line calls for sensitivity to another person’s availability and state of mind; urgent safety or health concerns may still require prompt communication.

If another person has faults or shortcomings, do not expose or publicize them. If another person has a private matter, do not disclose it. This historical injunction discourages fault-finding and breaches of confidence; it does not require silence about abuse, crime, fraud, or present danger, which should be reported through appropriate responsible channels rather than used for public humiliation.

“Speak of another person’s goodness” means to point out and commend their genuine strengths. “That itself is goodness” treats fair recognition of virtue as a good act. “When the person knows of it” means that the praised person becomes aware of this recognition. “They strive all the more” says that such knowledge may encourage them to keep improving and doing good. The passage calls for truthful appreciation, not flattery.

To publicize another person’s faults or wrongdoing is itself treated as wrongdoing. If hatred or denunciation becomes excessive, trouble may arise. This historical warning does not require serious misconduct to be concealed; matters affecting safety or the public interest should be reported through appropriate, responsible channels rather than broadcast indiscriminately or used to humiliate someone.

Encourage one another to do good, and the virtue of both will grow. If you see another person’s fault but fail to admonish them, both sides suffer a loss in moral conduct: one loses an opportunity to improve, while the other neglects the historical duty of well-intentioned counsel. Such counsel should be factual and respectful, not coercive.

“In every taking and giving” concerns all exchanges of money, goods, benefits, or assistance. “Clarity is most important” calls for clear terms, amounts, sources, and ownership so that neither side is misled or deprived. “Give, preferably, in greater measure” recommends generous help when one can afford it without harming others. “Take, preferably, in lesser measure” recommends restraint and rejection of greed. Today this should coexist with informed consent, honest records, fair dealings, and protection of one’s legitimate rights.

“When you are about to impose something on another” covers placing a demand, burden, treatment, or action upon them. “First ask yourself” requires considering whether you would accept it in their position. “If you would not want it yourself” identifies a treatment you reject for yourself. “Then stop promptly” says not to inflict on others a harm or unfairness that you would refuse. This is a rule of reciprocal respect, but personal preference does not replace attention to the other person’s rights, consent, and circumstances.

Seek to repay kindness received, and seek to let resentment go. Let the requiting of grievances end quickly, while gratitude and the repayment of kindness endure. This historical injunction urges people to remember favors and avoid prolonged feuds; it should not be read today as licensing even brief retaliation. Crime, danger, and unresolved harm may still call for protection, accountability, and repair.

In dealing with female and male household servants, one should value upright conduct. Uprightness is important, but it should be accompanied by kindness and leniency. The line reflects a historical master-servant hierarchy and cannot justify servitude, status inequality, humiliation, or corporal punishment today.

Using power, status, or force may make someone comply outwardly, but it does not necessarily win their agreement. Persuading people through sound reasons is presented as producing genuine acceptance, leaving no reasonable objection. The line contrasts coercion with argument; it should not be read as requiring unquestioning obedience to authority. Today, disagreements should be handled through equal dialogue and reasons that can be examined.

Though all are human, they are not all alike in moral character. Conventional and worldly people are many, while truly humane people are few. This is a traditional moral classification, not a claim that people are born into fixed social ranks or possess unequal human worth.

People generally stand in awe of someone who is truly humane. Such a person speaks frankly without concealment and bears no ingratiating expression. Here “awe” may include both respect and apprehension; the line praises integrity, not harshness, humiliation, or fear as ends in themselves.

Drawing close to humane and virtuous people is said to bring immense benefit: one’s virtue advances day by day, while one’s faults gradually diminish. This traditional counsel about moral company does not require unquestioning obedience to anyone labeled virtuous.

The text says that failing to draw close to humane and upright people brings harm without limit: people of poor character may then gain access, causing many affairs to go wrong. Here “petty people” is a traditional moral label, not a reference to people of low birth or social class.

“If one does not earnestly put learning into practice and only studies texts, superficiality and empty display will grow. What sort of person can one then become?” The line argues that learning should inform conduct; applying knowledge today does not require uncritical adherence to every historical norm.

If one concentrates only on practice without studying texts and principles, one may rely solely on personal views and remain ignorant of true principles. The line calls for combining study with practice; it need not be read today as requiring blind submission to ancient authority.

There are three essentials in reading: engagement of the mind, eyes, and mouth. The mind should concentrate, the eyes should attend closely to the text, and the mouth should recite it; all three are important. This describes a traditional reading method. Modern readers need not always read aloud, but concentration and accurate understanding remain important.

“While reading this” refers to the book or passage currently in hand. “Do not long for that” warns against abandoning it merely because another work seems more attractive. “This is not yet finished” marks the unfinished task. “Do not begin that” advises against immediately opening another one. The text recommends sustained attention; today this can discourage aimless switching, while purposeful changes for study plans, related sources, or verification are reasonable.

Set a generous time limit, but apply yourself diligently. When sufficient time and effort have been invested, what was obstructed or difficult to understand will gradually become clear. The historical maxim urges diligence within a realistic schedule, not harmful overwork.

“When the mind has a doubt” refers to any point that is unclear. “Note it down at once” advises recording the question before it is forgotten. “Approach someone and ask” means consulting a person with relevant knowledge. “Seek the exact meaning” makes accuracy the purpose, not merely obtaining a convenient answer. The text recommends recording and checking uncertainties; today, reliable sources and qualified experts, along with comparison of evidence, are appropriate safeguards.

“Keep the room orderly” asks that the study space be clean and arranged. “Keep the walls clean” calls for a reasonably clean surrounding space. “Keep the desk clean” requires the work surface to be free of dirt and clutter. “Keep brush and inkstone in place” asks that writing tools be properly set out and ready to use. The passage treats an orderly environment as a condition for study; today, the tools may be modern rather than brush and inkstone, while cleanliness and accessibility remain practical aims.

“The ink is ground crooked” depicts careless, inattentive handling. “The mind is not upright” is the text’s moral judgment that such carelessness reflects inner disorder. “The writing is not respectful” refers to sloppy or dismissive handwriting under the period’s standards. “The mind is already diseased” extends that judgment to the person’s character; it is a traditional moral metaphor, not a medical diagnosis. Today the practical point can be care and concentration, without labeling someone’s character or health from handwriting.

“Arrange the books” means to sort and place them in an orderly way. “Give them fixed locations” means that each book should have a designated place. “When reading is finished” marks the end of use. “Return them to their original places” requires putting them back where they belong. These are practical rules for organizing and preserving books; they can still be followed today without restricting the practice to classical texts.

Even when an urgent matter arises, the books or volumes should still be put in order rather than left carelessly because of haste. If a book is damaged, it should be repaired promptly. Valuable or fragile works should now be handled by a qualified conservator to avoid further damage.

“Books not in accord with the sages’ teaching” refers, in this traditional Confucian context, to writings regarded as unorthodox or harmful; it should not be taken to mean every noncanonical book. “Set them aside and do not read them” gives the historical injunction. “They obscure clear judgment and damage one’s resolve” states the harm attributed to such works. This reflects the orthodox reading norms of Qing elementary education, not a present-day endorsement of censorship or blanket bans.

Do not ruin yourself by rejecting what is right, and do not give yourself up as incapable of practicing benevolence and righteousness. Through continued learning and practice, the state of a sage or worthy may gradually be attained. This expresses a traditional Confucian ideal of self-cultivation.

Feedback