195. 锦瑟（李商隐）
正文
现代汉语译文
正文
锦瑟无端五十弦，一弦一柱思华年。
现代汉语译文
锦瑟啊，你无缘无故为什么有五十根弦？一根弦一根柱，都让我思念逝去的华年。
无端是嗔怪的语气：弦多到惹人烦——实际是岁数（近五十）的投射。一弦一柱是对年华的清点。
正文
庄生晓梦迷蝴蝶，望帝春心托杜鹃。
现代汉语译文
庄生梦里化蝶，醒来分不清哪个是梦哪个是真；望帝把一腔春心，托付给了啼血的杜鹃。
庄周梦蝶（《庄子》）与望帝化鹃（蜀王杜宇死后魂化杜鹃，啼声悲切）两个典故并置：一个是「不知自己是庄周还是蝴蝶」，一个是「换一种形态继续深情」。
正文
沧海月明珠有泪，蓝田日暖玉生烟。
现代汉语译文
沧海月明之夜，鲛人的珠泪盈盈；蓝田山日暖之时，美玉生出隐隐轻烟。
鲛人泣泪成珠（《博物志》）与蓝田玉气（戴叔伦语「诗家之景如蓝田日暖，良玉生烟，可望而不可置于眉睫之前」）——一句写悲极生光，一句写美到无法把握。
正文
此情可待成追忆，只是当时已惘然。
现代汉语译文
这份情意何须等到今天才成为追忆？就在当时，已经是惘然一片。
可待是「岂待」——不必等到追忆才珍贵。惘然二字是全诗的底色：身处其中的时候就没有把握，何况追忆。
赏析 · Commentary
一首诗的解读史：悼亡、自伤、诗序之争 · The History of Reading One Poem: Mourning, Self-Lament, or Preface
《锦瑟》的解读是中国诗学最著名的悬案：悼亡说（伤妻子王氏）、自伤说（伤自身沦落）、诗序说（元好问「望帝春心托杜鹃」与「锦瑟」并提，把它当作李商隐全部诗的序言）、恋情说（令狐家婢女名锦瑟）……历代各有主张，至今没有定论。悬案本身成为这首诗魅力的一部分：四个典故（蝶、鹃、珠、玉）各不相干，只被「追忆华年」这个框架松松拢住——读者填入什么，它就成什么。金人元好问「独恨无人作郑笺」、梁启超承认「讲不出什么确解，只觉得美」——一首诗让注释家集体认输，又让每个读者都觉得读得懂，这是它千年不衰的原因。
The interpretation of the Brocade Zither is the most celebrated open case in Chinese poetics: mourning for his wife née Wang; lament for his own fall; preface theory (Yuan Haowen set the cuckoo line beside the zither and took the poem as preface to all his verse); love-lore (a maid of the Linghu household named Brocade Zither)... each age has had its champion, none conclusive. The open case is part of the poem's power: four allusions — butterfly, cuckoo, pearl, jade — with nothing in common except the loose frame of remembering the flowering years, and whatever the reader pours in becomes the poem. Yuan Haowen sighed that no Zheng Xuan had arisen to annotate it; Liang Qichao admitted he could not explain it and found it beautiful all the same — a poem that defeats its annotators while every reader feels it understood: this is why it has never faded.
四个典故的排列：没有逻辑的逻辑 · Four Allusions in a Row: a Logic Without Logic
颔联颈联四个典故的排列历来被称道：庄生梦蝶（迷离）、望帝化鹃（哀托）、珠泪（悲光）、玉烟（美之不可即）。四个典故意象彼此独立——既不是时间顺序，也不是因果链条，只有一个共同点：都是「转化」（人化蝶、魂化鹃、泪化珠、玉化烟）。转化正是「华年」的本质：逝去的岁月没有消失，变成了别的形态存在。李商隐对典故的用法由此与用典传统分手：典故不再是论据，是意象——不需要「懂」，只需要「受」。尾联的惘然给这四幅画面统一的定影液：当时已如此，何况追忆。
The arrangement of the four allusions in the middle couplets has been praised for centuries: the butterfly dream (bewilderment), the cuckoo (grief entrusted), the pearl-tears (radiance out of sorrow), the jade vapor (beauty ungraspable). The four stand independent — no chronology, no causation — with one thing common: all are transformations (man to butterfly, soul to cuckoo, tears to pearl, jade to vapor). Transformation is the essence of the flowering years: what is lost does not vanish; it exists in another form. Here Li Shangyin parts ways with the allusive tradition: the allusion is no longer evidence but image — needing not to be understood but to be received. The blur of the closing couplet is the fixing-bath for all four pictures: such it was even then; remembrance holds it less.
无端五十弦：把岁数写进乐器 · Fifty Strings for No Reason: Writing One's Age into an Instrument
锦瑟本为二十五弦或五十弦，古说不同；李商隐写此诗约在四十六七岁，五十弦恰是他向暮之年的自照——但他不说我老了，而是嗔怪瑟：你无端弄这么多弦做什么？把对自己的抱怨转移到乐器上，是无理而妙的又一例。一弦一柱思华年紧跟着把嗔怪变成清点：每根弦对应一年，弹一遍等于重活一遍。乐器在这首诗里不是道具是身份：瑟的悲音在《诗经》《史记》里就有记载（泰帝使素女鼓五十弦瑟，帝悲不止）——李商隐选中的正是这件「弦多而声悲」的乐器，五十弦的数目与暮年的心绪在开头就完成了换算。
The zither's strings are given as twenty-five or fifty by different traditions; Li Shangyin wrote at about forty-six or seven, and fifty strings mirror his own late years — yet he does not say I am old; he scolds the instrument: why for no reason so many strings? Transferring self-reproach to the zither is again the unreasonable made right. String by string, bridge by bridge turns the scold into inventory: one string one year, to play through is to live through again. The instrument is not a prop here but a kin: the mournful zither is recorded from the Odes and the Records (the Black Emperor had the maiden Sunü play the fifty-string zither, and he could not stop grieving) — the one instrument whose strings are many and its sound sorrowful, its number and his late years converted at a stroke in the opening.